La incidencia de la estructuración subjetiva en la responsabilidad del psicótico en el acto criminal.
- Format
- BachelorThesis
- Status
- publishedVersion
- Description
La psicopatología ha concitado interés en las autoridades del sistema de justicia penal y de las instituciones de salud mental en los últimos años, motivo por el cual se plasmó en la presente investigación el objetivo de explorar la incidencia de la estructuración subjetiva en la responsabilidad del psicótico en el acto criminal, aplicándose la metodología descriptiva, deductiva, cualitativa, con base en la aplicación del paradigma de inferencias indiciales, cuyos resultados evidenciaron las diferencias de la estructuración subjetiva de dos criminales, uno perverso como Daniel Camargo y uno psicótico como Charles Mason, sobre quienes se analizó los fenómenos de la alineación, separación y relación parental, abordadas desde el punto de vista psicoanalítico por Freud, Lacan y Miller. Mientras el perverso intenta sacar provecho de la legislación, el psicótico se somete a ella, aunque ambos justifican su accionar. En conclusión, es necesario que la legislación penal establezca una estrecha relación del psicoanálisis y la criminología, para que los procesos de investigación y judicialización tengan mayores herramientas de comprensión que guíen sus objetivos.
The psychopathology has attracted the interest of the authorities of the criminal justice system and mental health institutions in recent years, which is why the objective of determining the incidence of subjective structuring in the responsibility was defined in the present investigation. of the psychotic in the criminal act, applying the descriptive, deductive, qualitative methodology, based on the application of the paradigm of indicial inferences, whose results evidenced the differences in the subjective structuring of two criminals, one perverse as Daniel Camargo and one psychotic as Charles Mason, in whom the phenomena of alignment, separation and parental relationship were analyzed, addressed from the psychoanalytic point of view by Freud, Lacan and Miller: in the case of the psychotic criminal there is guilt and enjoyment subsequent to the unleashing, while the perverse denies his criminal act despite being obvious, the psychotic he accepts it and rejoices over its commitment, to then request the punishment and suffer during its execution, observing also that while the perverse takes advantage of the legislation, the psychotic submits to it, although both justify their actions. In conclusion, it is necessary that criminal law establish a close relationship with psychoanalysis based on the science of criminology, so that through this technique the inmate diagnosed with some psychosis can receive treatment that can minimize his mental disorder and not aggravate it, not only for their own benefit, but for the welfare of society.
- Publication Year
- 2018
- Language
- spa
- Topic
- PSICOSIS
PSICÓTICO
NEUROSIS
ACTO CRIMINAL
- Repository
- Repositorio Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil
- Get full text
- http://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec/handle/3317/10393
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/